This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
chara:discussion_of_alignment_procedures [2024/07/10 19:09] gail_stargazer |
chara:discussion_of_alignment_procedures [2024/07/10 19:35] (current) gail_stargazer |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
* If coma and astigmatism high, create sky flat on bright star - Turn off **[DM]**, **[SV FLT]**, **[FLATEN]**, | * If coma and astigmatism high, create sky flat on bright star - Turn off **[DM]**, **[SV FLT]**, **[FLATEN]**, | ||
* For IR combiners, move beacon flat to align star to STST. | * For IR combiners, move beacon flat to align star to STST. | ||
- | * For SPICA, move beacon flat to align star on SPICA FTT. <font inherit/ | + | * For SPICA, move beacon flat to align star on SPICA FTT. <font inherit/ |
- | * <font inherit/ | + | * <font inherit/ |
+ | * Star Acquired. | ||
+ | | ||
==== Proposed Revisions to Current Alignment Sequence ==== | ==== Proposed Revisions to Current Alignment Sequence ==== | ||
Line 177: | Line 179: | ||
First night with AO running on all 6 telescopes (after W2 DM installation): | First night with AO running on all 6 telescopes (after W2 DM installation): | ||
- | Notes from Gail: | + | **Notes from Gail:** |
We took a short video last night comparing the spots on the Six Telescope Star Tracker (J-band) with the AO on versus AO off. There' | We took a short video last night comparing the spots on the Six Telescope Star Tracker (J-band) with the AO on versus AO off. There' | ||
Line 183: | Line 185: | ||
The video starts with AO on. Then the AO servo' | The video starts with AO on. Then the AO servo' | ||
- | Notes from Denis: | + | **Notes from Denis:** |
I have posted some SPICA images recorded during the same engineering tests. They can be viewed on this link: | I have posted some SPICA images recorded during the same engineering tests. They can be viewed on this link: | ||
- | https:// | + | [[https:// |
For all sequences, we have, from left to right, E1-W2-W1-S2-S1-E1. Images are 10ms exposure and the gifs are ' | For all sequences, we have, from left to right, E1-W2-W1-S2-S1-E1. Images are 10ms exposure and the gifs are ' | ||
- | 04-56-44: initial situation after opening and standard alignment. Large residual static aberrations on W2W1 clearly. Flux on E's is much less than others. Flat on W1, W2 does not improve the situation. | + | |
- | 06-31-05: We did a stow, then M7 to default, and then dichroic alignment. Situation is better (but seeing may have evolved in the meantime). | + | |
- | 07-15-03: BF/M7 alignment. The TopLeft-BottomRight elongation is related to the atmospheric refraction (zenithal distance ~40°). | + | |
- | 07-30-33: same record close loop \\ | + | |
- | 07-34-41: record open loop | + | |
From the last record, it can be seen that the seeing was really poor. The encircled energy computation goes from 3% (open loop) to 7-8% in close loop. We are still far from 25% as expected but the atmospheric refraction (not yet compensated) is also a limitation of course, as well as the seeing conditions. Many beams have residual static aberrations, | From the last record, it can be seen that the seeing was really poor. The encircled energy computation goes from 3% (open loop) to 7-8% in close loop. We are still far from 25% as expected but the atmospheric refraction (not yet compensated) is also a limitation of course, as well as the seeing conditions. Many beams have residual static aberrations, |